To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing services in Kenya, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Chad shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone.
What Do You Think?
How would you vote?
Vote to see the result.
What Happened in Congress?
Not yet voted on the floor.
Where the Bill Stands
- Introduced, done
- Committee, current stage
- Floor Vote, not yet
- Outcome, not yet
What This Bill Does
Specifically, under the bill, a qualified hazardous duty area is treated as a combat zone for purposes of
- determining the filing status of an individual whose spouse is missing in action;
- excluding compensation received by a member of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone from gross income and wages subject to withholding;
- forgiving the income tax liability of a member of the Armed Forces who dies in a combat zone;
- certain estate tax rules applicable to a member of the Armed Forces who dies in a combat zone or as a result of an injury, wound, or disease suffered while in a combat zone;
- the exemption from the federal excise tax imposed on certain telephone services for telephone calls originating from a combat zone by a member of the Armed Forces; and
- postponing certain federal tax deadlines (e.g., filing a tax return, paying taxes, and claiming a tax refund) for a member of the Armed Forces serving in a combat zone.
The bill defines a qualified hazardous duty area as Kenya, Mali, Burkina Faso, and Chad if any member of the U.S. Armed Forces is entitled to special pay (e.g., hostile fire pay and imminent danger pay) for services performed in such locations.
Sponsors
Related Documents
Timeline
- Library of CongressIntroduced in House
- House floor actionsReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced
- Committee

Comments
Comments with insults, hate speech or personal information are removed.