Skip to Content

Do you allow analytics?

We use analytics tools to understand how people use the site. They're optional: if you decline, the site works the same, no analytics cookies are set and Google gets only a cookieless, anonymous count signal. Your votes are saved either way; the details are in the privacy policy.

Referandom is here: Tinder for Congress πŸ”₯

Support Referandom
EconomyH.R. 5349Comments

TAS Act

Official title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve services provided to taxpayers by the Internal Revenue Service by providing greater judicial review.

What Do You Think?

How would you vote?

Referandom Vote

Vote to see the result.

Where the Bill Stands

  1. Introduced, done
  2. Committee, done
  3. Floor Vote, done
  4. Outcome, current stage

What This Bill Does

This bill expands the authority of the U.S. Tax Court to issue subpoenas, authorizes the Tax Court to extend certain petition deadlines, and makes other changes related to Tax Court procedures.

The bill authorizes the Tax Court to issue subpoenas compelling the production of documents and other items from a litigant or witness for evidentiary or discovery purposes (whether or not it is in connection with a scheduled hearing). (Under current law, the Tax Court may issue subpoenas only to compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of evidence at a scheduled hearing or deposition.)

The bill authorizes the Tax Court to extend (or toll) the deadline to file a Tax Court petition contesting an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) deficiency notice if it is equitable to do so (known as equitable tolling). Further, under the bill, the dismissal of a petition contesting an IRS deficiency notice because the petition is not filed before the deadline and equitable tolling is denied is not treated as a decision of the Tax Court. This allows a subsequent claim to be filed in U.S. district court if certain conditions are met.

The bill also

  • expands the type of Tax Court proceedings for which special trial judges may be appointed,
  • authorizes Tax Court special trial judges to impose fines up to $5,000 and up to 30 days in jail for contempt of court, and
  • requires Tax Court judges and special trial judges to recuse themselves in certain circumstances.

Sponsors

Related Documents

Timeline

  1. SenateSenate Committee on Finance discharged by Unanimous Consent.
  2. Passed Both Chambers, Resolving Differences
  3. SenateReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
  4. House floor actionsMr. Smith (MO) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  5. House floor actionsReported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-335.
  6. House committee actionsCommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  7. Library of CongressIntroduced in House
  8. House floor actionsReferred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
  9. Introduced
  10. Committee

Comments

Comments with insults, hate speech or personal information are removed.